ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

12
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子893
魅力2105
注册时间2013-08-12

ottobre

只看楼主

请问huaren网站是否支持 选票交易?

3555

11

2016-11-04 09:12:58

Clinton的支持者正在闲话版发起 非法 选票交易,[url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086416&forumpage=1]http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086416&forumpage=1[/url]

请问huaren网站是否允许?
如果可以,huaren作为非法交易平台,trump的支持者也许同样开始发起选票交易,或者举报。
如果不可以,请暂锁HumaAbedin 的邮箱直到大选之后。这个id已经发出了广告并承诺线下交易。以后又任何id类似活动,也请版务一视同仁

------------------
我不懂法律,后来其他网友提醒,议员申明,即使不涉及现金,任何形式的选票交易都是违法的。

Today, Raskin, who is now a state senator running for Congress, says vote trading is “perfectly legal” — largely thanks to a 2007 court case.

In the aftermath of the 2000 election, one of the vote trading sites, VoteSwap2000.com, brought a suit before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The resulting case, Porter v. Bowen, established vote trading as “clearly protected by the First Amendment.” To this day, it is the only authoritative legal case on record on the topic.
Huaren
等级中士
威望1
贴子1179
魅力1168
注册时间2016-01-07

iamsunshine

只看他

2016-11-04 09:32:35

你们川粉早就明晃晃的开始研究怎么作弊了,且不说各种造谣抹黑,怎么没见你“正直”的来投诉呢?

说到投票作弊,投过票的jms说一下,不是美国公民,如果11月8号去曼哈顿或法拉盛的投票点试着投票,在场怎么识别是不是公民?每个人光拿驾照和SSN不可以么?必须拿着出生证明或者护照? 既然巫婆耍赖,很多州不投票的默认是投给民主党,而且这次肯定还有一个死人投8次给民主党的情况发生,有些州非法移民拿驾照就能投, 就想8号也去各个投票点试一试,没准运气好能硬投trump一票?就是不知道曼哈顿这种大城市投票点会不会管的很严?
问了两个美国同事,说可以去试试。。。没准能混过去?

yuerde 发表于 10/21/2016 8:29:30 PM
Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子893
魅力2105
注册时间2013-08-12

ottobre

只看楼主

2016-11-04 09:57:53

你们川粉早就明晃晃的开始研究怎么作弊了,且不说各种造谣抹黑,怎么没见你“正直”的来投诉呢?

说到投票作弊,投过票的jms说一下,不是美国公民,如果11月8号去曼哈顿或法拉盛的投票点试着投票,在场怎么识别是不是公民?每个人光拿驾照和SSN不可以么?必须拿着出生证明或者护照? 既然巫婆耍赖,很多州不投票的默认是投给民主党,而且这次肯定还有一个死人投8次给民主党的情况发生,有些州非法移民拿驾照就能投, 就想8号也去各个投票点试一试,没准运气好能硬投trump一票?就是不知道曼哈顿这种大城市投票点会不会管的很严?
问了两个美国同事,说可以去试试。。。没准能混过去?

yuerde 发表于 10/21/2016 8:29:30 PM
iamsunshine 发表于 11/4/2016 9:32:35 AM

吃药了么?不要说HumaAbedin正好是你的mj。

我就投诉我看到的。你自己去投诉啊。
Huaren
等级中士
威望1
贴子1179
魅力1168
注册时间2016-01-07

iamsunshine

只看他

2016-11-04 10:03:12




吃药了么?不要说我投诉的正好是你的mj。
我就投诉我看到的。你自己去投诉啊。


ottobre 最后编辑于 2016-11-04 09:59:01


报告版主,此id进行人身攻击
Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子893
魅力2105
注册时间2013-08-12

ottobre

只看楼主

2016-11-04 10:04:24

报告版主,此id进行人身攻击
iamsunshine 发表于 11/4/2016 10:03:12 AM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086430&postid=73214687#73214687]

[/url]
关心一下你的健康,看你激动成这样,你自己举报呗

版主,先来后到,你也该先看我的举报吧!
Huaren
等级中士
威望1
贴子1179
魅力1168
注册时间2016-01-07

iamsunshine

只看他

2016-11-04 10:05:34

关心一下你的健康,看你激动成这样,你自己举报呗

版主,先来后到,你也该先看我的举报吧!

ottobre 发表于 11/4/2016 10:04:24 AM [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086430&postid=73214700#73214700]

[/url]
没你激动,看你激动的都忍不住进行人身攻击了
Huaren
等级大校
威望64
贴子52202
魅力63778
注册时间2010-02-07

bangobunny

只看他

2016-11-04 10:08:02

楼主说的不对 Today, Raskin, who is now a state senator running for Congress, says vote trading is “perfectly legal” — largely thanks to a 2007 court case. In the aftermath of the 2000 election, one of the vote trading sites, VoteSwap2000.com, brought a suit before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The resulting case, Porter v. Bowen, established vote trading as “clearly protected by the First Amendment.” To this day, it is the only authoritative legal case on record on the topic.
Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子893
魅力2105
注册时间2013-08-12

ottobre

只看楼主

2016-11-04 10:08:58

回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086430&postid=73214740#73214740]7楼bangobunny的帖子[/url] 我改。。。。
Huaren
等级三等兵
威望--
贴子148
魅力196
注册时间2016-10-31

HumaAbedin

只看他

2016-11-04 11:15:22

回复 [url=http://forums.huaren.us/showtopic.aspx?topicid=2086430&forumpage=1#73214971]10楼ottobre的帖子[/url]
Trump trading is based on the honor system. But for that reason, it’s also perfectly legal: It’s simply a matter of voters publicly expressing their political preference, so it’s protected by the First Amendment. After the 2000 election, the National Voting Rights Institute and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California brought a case on behalf of three Nader Trader sites —[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20001104075625/http:/votexchange2000.com/]Votexchange2000.com[/url], [url=http://web.archive.org/web/20001104075625/http:/www.voteswap2000.com/]Voteswap2000.com[/url] and [url=http://web.archive.org/web/20001202042800/http:/www.nadertrader.com/]Nadertrader.com[/url] — resulting in a Ninth Circuit ruling in [url=http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2007/08/06/0655517.pdf]Porter v. Bowen[/url] that the Nader Trader exchanges in 2000 were constitutionally protected speech and conduct.
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级三等兵
威望--
贴子148
魅力196
注册时间2016-10-31

HumaAbedin

只看他

2016-11-04 11:15:32

[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/16/opinion/anti-trump-republicans-dont-waste-your-vote-trade-it.html?_r=0]http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/16/opinion/anti-trump-republicans-dont-waste-your-vote-trade-it.html?_r=0[/url]
初始化编辑器...

到底了