每次也都有你
re，卖家哪儿不对我们都看见了，怎么着，卖家不对就等于买家都对了？！卖家不对能说，买家不对就不能说了？这个买家也够喝一壶的了。11块多的开衫、裙子、裤子，还 “囤货”！还“当然里面有白的也有不白的”！还“囤货的具体概念我不清楚，有些衣服质量不好，但我没有计较，就当用白菜弥补了”！！苍天啊大地啊！谁看见这么无知的言论会不生气啊！你不清楚，你自己考古一下你做做功课行吗？你有什么权利把人家的“白菜”叫做“囤货”啊？无知很光荣吗？不清楚你别来换版行吗？每次看见那些在换版问一些白痴问题的人“怎么申请资格啊我不清楚”“怎么这个啊”“怎么那个啊”，我就觉得，真不够生气的，版规那么清楚在那儿都不看，活得真是够随意的。
赞“活的随意”这句话我要抄下来
看了卖家mm开的list， 然后买家还说有的白有的不白 我无语。。。。。。。
lz真执着。。。。
我觉得lz真心没觉得自己有错，只是迫于群众压力寄了衣服，心里还不一定多憋屈呢。其实事情的来龙去脉在买家的帖子里已经说得很清楚了，买家也已经更新到一楼对误导的事道过歉了。lz居然还不依不饶。。。。
没觉得LZ不依不饶， 倒是觉得更新的有理有据的。 卖家是不对，但是不表示买家说的就是对的。 买家这么混淆视听， 让大家对卖家猛拍， 再我看来，更可恶！！！
"P买家" ....
support little bear and kakagirl.
BanZhu and other big IDs are used to be both sellers and buyers. Now they stand as sellers more than buyers. I am sure they were all annoyed by some buyers, either argue with prices or don't pay after saying so. However, I am wondering if most of the buyers here have bad credits? Or only small part of them?
Trust is built between both seller and buyer. This buyer mm took advantage of seller mm for buying that cheap shirt. However, the seller mm broke the trust and took the shirt off the selling list without informing the buyer mm. Can anyone say that the seller is doing the right thing?
the buyer slandered the seller and misled others in purpose. Can anyone say that the buyer was doing the right thing?
[此贴子已经被作者于2011/10/20 15:58:47编辑过]
既然事情解决了，转反馈区大家继续吧。
其实是非自在人心，没有绝对的正确，各人看法不同很正常，不是大是大非的问题没必要说服对方。双方保留各自看法就好了。
既然事情解决了，转反馈区大家继续吧。
其实是非自在人心，没有绝对的正确，各人看法不同很正常，不是大是大非的问题没必要说服对方。双方保留各自看法就好了。
到底了
Hot Deals
All Deals