supersleeper
讨论下最高法院判决的逻辑谬误
443
3
2024-03-04 11:30:45
最高法院今天这个判决一点都不出乎意料, 但是充满逻辑谬误
1 承认trump和MAGA在2021年试图政变推翻美国政府未遂
2 认定federalism 大于state rights
3 之前Doub判决堕胎非法时候认定states right小于federalism
4 MAGA保守派法官之前判决号称是originalist就是说要按照宪法和修正案当时起草人的字面意思来判决。这次这个14修正案字面意思再清楚不过了，可是这次它们不作为了。真是前后矛盾脸都不要了
前后矛盾完全不顾任何逻辑任何脸面了
举个例子；
MAGA/SCOTUS: we believe in states rights
KANSAS: we''re refusing to ban reproductive rights in our state constitution
MAGA: except that
OHIO: we''re protecting repro rights in our state constitution
MAGA: and that
COLORADO: trump is disqualified
SCOTUS: no more states rights!!!
2 认定federalism 大于state rights
3 之前Doub判决堕胎非法时候认定states right小于federalism
==============
没看出来这两个有什么矛盾的
"Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the states, responsible for enforcing section 3 against all federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse,"
宪法规定国会决定联邦官员和候选人，而不是各州。恨简单。
到底了
Hot Deals
All Deals