显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

56789101112
/60
Huaren
等级一等兵
威望--
贴子330
魅力591
注册时间2013-07-03

雷锋叔叔

只看他

2013-07-18 12:55:00

以下是引用xiaomeimei202在7/18/2013 12:53:00 PM的发言:

MEDICAID是不是每个州不一样啊

Yes, medicaid 是具体洲执行的
Huaren
等级中尉
威望2
贴子2367
魅力2904
注册时间2010-01-18

superbaozi

只看他

2013-07-18 12:55:00

以下是引用雷锋叔叔在7/18/2013 12:53:00 PM的发言:

国内是先缴钱后看病然后报销吧

嗯。。。好像是先付一笔押金,然后出院时候付的就是医保cover之后的部分了。。。我家人住院开刀,最后好像自己只付了一千块不到。。。我听了也吃了一惊。。。国内讨厌的就是很多进口药不cover,当然可以选择国产,但是长辈生病总想用好药不是?
Huaren
等级大校
威望22
贴子18911
魅力20850
注册时间2013-01-25

牛奶白

只看他

2013-07-18 12:55:00

现在想日后几年后的事儿其实也不靠谱,政策说变就变,尤其obamacare不知道要怎么样,现在大家的父母是否已经可以办绿卡了?有了绿卡加上obamacare,至少可以花少量钱给老人买个保险,只是肯定比不上昂贵的那种保险了
Huaren
等级大校
威望56
贴子45442
魅力46411
注册时间2011-08-28

译码

只看他

2013-07-18 12:57:00

以下是引用xiaomeimei202在7/18/2013 12:53:00 PM的发言:

MEDICAID是不是每个州不一样啊

是的
Huaren
等级大校
威望56
贴子45442
魅力46411
注册时间2011-08-28

译码

只看他

2013-07-18 12:58:00

以下是引用JXfun在7/18/2013 12:54:00 PM的发言:
没有时间爬楼,不知道有没有人已经提过,如果父母愿意移民,赶紧给父母办绿卡,替他们交十个点,他们就可以用medicare了。

四十个,不是十个
Huaren
等级上士
威望1
贴子1467
魅力1855
注册时间2009-12-28

bigfish1984

只看他

2013-07-18 12:56:00

以下是引用dimplemm在7/18/2013 12:54:00 PM的发言:

国家规定无论是公务员还是事业单位ms都是90%,然后就看各单位的政策了,很多有补贴.我觉得90%也很好了

90%我就太满意了, 10万的费用出一万就好了。。真心是不错

Huaren
等级中尉
威望2
贴子2367
魅力2904
注册时间2010-01-18

superbaozi

只看他

2013-07-18 12:57:00

以下是引用译码在7/18/2013 12:58:00 PM的发言:

四十个,不是十个

这个要多少钱?
Huaren
等级一等兵
威望--
贴子330
魅力591
注册时间2013-07-03

雷锋叔叔

只看他

2013-07-18 12:57:00

国内这几年是政府卖地有钱,以后经济不好能不能报销就难说了
Huaren
等级大校
威望21
贴子16878
魅力16770
注册时间2010-10-10

怎样让大排不硬

只看他

2013-07-18 12:57:00

以下是引用risk在7/18/2013 12:50:00 PM的发言:

 

如果父母的绿卡是儿女 sponsor的,在他们入籍之前,是不能拿 fed 的福利的,所以没有公民前,用 Medicaid, fed是可以向子女追讨得。

这个也是误传。首先虽然caid是联邦和州共同fund, 管理还是州的事情,联邦只是出钱。。。。第二所谓的公共福利,是指现金福利,比如SSI这种,医疗保险这种(非long-term的)不算...看移民局网站 http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=829b0a5659083210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=829b0a5659083210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD

Q.  What publicly funded benefits may not be considered for public charge purposes?
A.  Non-cash benefits (other than institutionalization for long-term care) are generally not taken into account for purposes of a public charge determination.

Special-purpose cash assistance is also generally not taken into account for purposes of public charge determination.

Non-cash or special-purpose cash benefits are generally supplemental in nature and do not make a person primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.  Therefore, past, current, or future receipt of these benefits do not impact a public charge determination.  Non-cash or special purpose cash benefits that are not considered for public charge purposes include:

  • Medicaid and other health insurance and health services (including public assistance for immunizations and for testing and treatment of symptoms of communicable diseases; use of health clinics, short-term rehabilitation services, and emergency medical services) other than support for long-term institutional care
  • Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
  • Nutrition programs, including Food Stamps, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, and other supplementary and emergency food assistance programs
  • Housing benefits
  • Child care services
  • Energy assistance, such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
  • Emergency disaster relief
  • Foster care and adoption assistance
  • Educational assistance (such as attending public school), including benefits under the Head Start Act and aid for elementary, secondary, or higher education
  • Job training programs
  • In-kind, community-based programs, services, or assistance (such as soup kitchens, crisis counseling and intervention, and short-term shelter)

State and local programs that are similar to the federal programs listed above are also generally not considered for public charge purposes.  Please be aware that states may adopt different names for the same or similar publicly funded programs. It is the underlying nature of the program, not the name adopted in a particular state, which determines whether or not it should be considered for public charge purposes.  In California, for example, Medicaid is called "Medi-Cal" and CHIP is called "Healthy Families."  These benefits are not considered for public charge purposes.

In addition, and consistent with existing practice, cash payments that have been earned, such as Title II Social Security benefits, government pensions, and veterans' benefits, among other forms of earned benefits, do not support a public charge determination. Unemployment compensation is also not considered for public charge purposes.



[此贴子已经被作者于2013/7/18 12:58:12编辑过]

ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级二等兵
威望--
贴子280
魅力284
注册时间2013-04-15

keyiyoumajia

只看楼主

2013-07-18 12:57:00

这个怎么替呢?是作假说他们有工作吗?还是像有人说避税那样。自己开个小公司什么的。如果是后者,麻烦也可以考虑呀。
以下是引用JXfun在7/18/2013 12:54:00 PM的发言:
没有时间爬楼,不知道有没有人已经提过,如果父母愿意移民,赶紧给父母办绿卡,替他们交十个点,他们就可以用medicare了。

初始化编辑器...

到底了