[结束啦, 谢谢大家]辩论赛大结局!

浏览过的版块

等级上尉

威望14

贴子2675

魅力3368

注册时间2004-01-30

valentina

查看全部

[结束啦, 谢谢大家]辩论赛大结局!

8239

2004-04-08 17:41:00

好呀, 开始拉, 大家努力!!!!!!!!!!!!!

等级上尉

威望14

贴子2675

魅力3368

注册时间2004-01-30

valentina

查看全部

2004-04-11 16:24:00

I must say both sides did a great job!!! congratulations!!!!

However, one input for both sides: although the readers can easily deduce the topic of this debate from the context, it is better that both sides declare their moot up front for clarity purpose.

等级上尉

威望14

贴子2675

魅力3368

注册时间2004-01-30

valentina

查看全部

2004-04-24 20:27:00

good point... let's see how the affirmative and negative sides take up this~~~

以下是引用sunnyqiu在2004-4-24 1:53:32的发言：
very interesting topics...it is not only about language, also a good training in "logic"...

DId the topic come from the old saying " 人要衣装“。 if it did, I have a "dummy"question here---how to define the clothes? Only the "clothes" which we wear, or we can extend the idea to other staff such as makeup or anything else related to the appearance?

等级上尉

威望14

贴子2675

魅力3368

注册时间2004-01-30

valentina

查看全部

2004-05-25 14:35:00

quaint mm, i pm aya long time ago,but obviously not working... maybe u should try ~~

等级上尉

威望14

贴子2675

魅力3368

注册时间2004-01-30

valentina

查看全部

2004-06-05 01:32:00

sorry, a bit late...

first my congrats to both sides, great job done~~~

Each side presented, elaborated and defended their topic in a clean and definitive way. Very impressive!!!!

My overall impression is similar to that of coldhan, although clothes do render first impression important but it does not define a person truely. Teagy and oncognes captured the essence and are very persuasive on this part...

My vote would be for teagy and oncognes [em00][em00]!!!!

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-5 1:32:58编辑过]