paprika
公司要mandate疫苗的,可以用这两个办法跟HR交涉 --- purplebasil,我在273楼给你回复了
60309
340
2021-08-01 23:34:07
第一个是可以用这个legal document,要求公司HR要签字,你才会打。HR肯定会怂。
NOTE TO EMPLOYER: As your employee, I am requesting that you review this document, provide the requisite information, and sign the form, in regards to your requirement that employees get a Covid- 19 emergency use authorization (EUA) investigational vaccine.
第二个是还可以找自己的家庭医生开medical exempt的证明信,VAERS数据库里面有这么多side effects,找一个可能跟自己相关的,比如说你本来血小板就低一点,打疫苗有额外出血风险,或者在准备怀孕等等,联系上VAERS数据库里面的data,让自己的家庭医生写了信,HR就没有办法了。
如果得过covid有抗体的jm们,还可以还可以加上这个新的paper
https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(21)00203-2
Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells
Summary
Ending the COVID-19 pandemic will require long-lived immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Here, we evaluate 254 COVID-19 patients longitudinally up to 8 months and find durable broad-based immune responses. SARS-CoV-2 spike binding and neutralizing antibodies exhibit a bi-phasic decay with an extended half-life of >200 days suggesting the generation of longer-lived plasma cells. SARS-CoV-2 infection also boosts antibody titers to SARS-CoV-1 and common betacoronaviruses. In addition, spike-specific IgG+ memory B cells persist, which bodes well for a rapid antibody response upon virus re-exposure or vaccination. Virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are polyfunctional and maintained with an estimated half-life of 200 days. Interestingly, CD4+ T cell responses equally target several SARS-CoV-2 proteins, whereas the CD8+ T cell responses preferentially target the nucleoprotein, highlighting the potential importance of including the nucleoprotein in future vaccines. Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.
大家要抗争!坚持一下就是胜利。这个mandate的趋势很快就会扭转的。看以色列和英国的最新数据,形势已经越来越明朗了,很快他们就要编不下去了。
freys 发表于 2021-08-01 21:49
感谢mm分享。疫苗exempt在美国是个常见的procedure,每个州都有自己的立法来协调。宗教,医学或者个人原因是大部分州都承认的赦免原因。网上也有很多tutorial and template,指导怎么阐述原因和申请赦免。根本不存在有人说的作弊。楼里出言不逊的可能根本就不知道这回事。不用理会。
还有,很多州已经决定了,这次新冠疫苗赦免标准遵从measles vaccine exempt guidelines.有需要的人可以自己搜索。
我从没有觉得楼主是以专家身份来分享。你回头看看她的每次分享,每一次都是给出信息和数据,给愿意思考的人一些线索。现在政府拼了命的压制任何疫苗副作用的信息,对于有理性思考的人群来说,楼主顶着巨大的压力(参见这个帖子里那些漫骂和冷嘲热讽的留言)来分享是个很勇敢的行为,我为她点赞。至于那些人身攻击的judgemental的无任何实质内容的帖子,我完全忽略。
在我看,你觉得楼主是专家来传道,是你的misconception, 或者再坦诚一点,是你的bias. 你进一步以你和你老公的教育背景,来贬低楼主的学术水平,那就是明明白白的judgemental and personal attack. 你这番话本身就直接discredit yourself.
你的观察是正确的。美国政府完全有实力在新冠死亡和疫苗死亡这两件事上追根问底,但是选择了不作为。这是为什么呢?可以肯定这不是个草率的决定。
是不是查清了后真相很ugly?极大可能和政府致力推广的narrative背道而驰,所以不能细察,至少不能和大众分享。
到底了
HOT DEALS