显示热门

深色模式

字体大小|

搜索
ADVERTISEMENT
返回
  • 浏览过的版块

1
ADVERTISEMENT
Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子880
魅力1413
注册时间2003-02-11

herbs

查看全部

连WSJ都开始质疑幼儿新冠疫苗了

31334

80

2022-07-06 22:22:50

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-the-rush-for-toddler-vaccines-covid-pandemic-children-fda-pfizer-moderna-medicine-evidence-11656951993


More troubling, vaccinated toddlers in Pfizer's trial were more likely to get severely ill with Covid than those who received a placebo. Pfizer claimed most severe cases weren't "clinically significant," whatever that means, but this was all the more reason that the FDA should have required a longer follow-up before authorizing the vaccine.


Also worrisome: Most kids who developed multiple infections during the trial were vaccinated. This warranted more investigation, since experimental vaccines for other diseases sometimes increase susceptibility to infection.


Scientists are also discovering that triple-vaccinated adults who were previously infected with the Wuhan variant have a weaker immune response to Omicron, leaving them more susceptible to reinfection. This phenomenon, called "immunological imprinting," could explain why children who received three Pfizer shots were more likely to get reinfected.


Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子880
魅力1413
注册时间2003-02-11

herbs

查看全部

2022-07-06 22:33:02

“If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look forcomfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair.”

— C.S. Lewis


越来越多的数据表明大流行会没完没了,在现有的社会结构下,疫情会逐渐恶化,而不是天真的愿望的那样病毒会越来越弱。这个世界比若泽·萨拉马戈笔下的失明世界还要魔幻,无数人尤其是当权派无视残酷的现实,把美好的妄想当做真理来指导行动。比如,美国前抗疫主管Dr. Deborah Birx最近承认当初告诉民众疫苗有效是基于愿望,而不是科学。在无数妄想破灭之后,终有一天,失明世界会成为复明世界,这个过程需要人们逐渐形成不改变现有社会结构和基础设施,大流行就会没完没了的共识。新冠破坏人体的免疫系统,比空气传播的艾滋病还要严重,应该成为第一共识。


只有这些共识形成之后,人类才会采取口罩、室内高效空气净化器和UV消毒之类的短期防护措施。长期来看,人类必须改变社会结构和基础设施。我看到未来人类会疏散高楼大厦,分散居住,甚至建立笼罩城市的巨大穹顶。

Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子880
魅力1413
注册时间2003-02-11

herbs

查看全部

2022-07-07 11:03:58

楼主要搞清楚 WSJ Opinion 和 WSJ News 是两个不同的东西。这个相当于读者来信,许多新闻媒体为了保证公正性都会开辟Opinion专栏发表热门话题正反两个方面的意见。像楼主这样拿Opinion版的文章冠上WSJ的名字有mislead的嫌疑。


我各人对幼儿疫苗的问题,由于死亡率低,所以也怀疑打疫苗的必要性,但反对楼主这种做法。下面是WSJ关于它的Opinion版的声明,特别强调这两个版的不同,Opinion版的文章不代表WSJ的看法和认可。



https://newsliteracy.wsj.com/news-opinion/


nj_guy 发表于 2022-07-07 07:32

我摘出的3条是事实,不是Opinion。


另外,以前任何以简单科学事实为基础的质疑疫苗的Opinion都不可能在WSJ之类的猪妹发表。

Huaren
等级下士
威望1
贴子880
魅力1413
注册时间2003-02-11

herbs

查看全部

2022-07-07 20:29:27

很好,你就活在哪个罩子里吧。


Wpzzz 发表于 2022-07-07 16:04

我讲的未来是以百年为尺度的,我们大部分人活不到建立巨大穹顶的时代。2020年2月我看到了未来600年的掠影,穹顶时代的到来非常缓慢。我们这个时代是各种思想和方案交锋的混乱时代,没有几十年的折腾是走不出的。穹顶时代的到来有两个大前提:超强变异毒株、超级建筑技术。

初始化编辑器...

到底了